EXPLORING THE FUNCTIONS OF IMPLICATURES IN NORTHERN KURMANJI

Authors

  • Nechirvan H. Jawzal Dept. of English Language, College of Humanities, University of Zakho, Kurdistan Region – Iraq.
  • Fakhir O. Mohammed Dept. of English Language, College of Humanities, University of Zakho, Kurdistan Region – Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2025.13.3.1559

Keywords:

Northern Kurmanji, Implicatures, Pragmatics, Conversational Analysis, Cultural Dynamics, Social Interactions, Communicative Strategies

Abstract

The current paper explores the functions of implicatures in Northern Kurmanji (NK). It lays concentration on the non-literal meanings (interpretation) that speakers convey beyond the literal one of either their speech or writing. Data were collected through purposive sampling from senior university students in experimental and control groups. The participants were chosen for their availability and willingness to participate. They self-recorded informal conversations to explore various functions of implicature, including explanation, criticism, empathy, contemplation, and humor.  There was identification of the reasons behind implicatures, which included explanation, criticism, empathy, philosophical contemplation, and humor. The results dictate that, in one hand a strategic use of implicatures was utilized by the control group. The participants of the control group often employed implicatures to help with expressing deeper emotional and philosophical engagement. On the other hand, the experimental group used implicatures mainly for functions related to immediate and practical social exchanges. It is also found that the functions of implicatures in NK represents the cultural and contextual dynamics which denotes communicative strategies of the NK. Further studies can be explored to identify the role of implicatures in modern digital communication and to compare data across different Kurdish dialects and sociocultural contexts.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Hasan, I. A. (2022). A study of Kurdish EFL university learners' comprehension of implicatures. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 11(4), 322-327. https://doi.org/10.25007/ajnu.v11n4a1604

Horn, L. R., & Ward, G. L. (2004). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

Idris Musa, R. E., & Mohammed, B. (2022). The role of conversational implicature in daily conversations – What matters, content or context? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(5), 886-893. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1205.08

Imad, M. (2022). An empirical study of pragmatic failure by Kurdish EFL learners in the performance of conversational implicature. The Scientific Journal of Cihan University – Sulaimanyia, 6(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.25098/6.2.24

Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 22 December 2014.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Leung, S. (2002). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/L4131005054

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Li, X. (2024). A pragmatic analysis of humor words in English advertisements. English Language and Literature Studies, 6(2), 193-193. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n2p193

Moheddin, K., & Hamadamin, M. F. (2022). Politeness and daily use of language in formal context among EFL Kurdish learners: Soran University as an example. Journal of Al-Maarif University College, 33(2), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.51345/.v33i2.499.g276

Mokoro, E. (2024). Pragmatic competence in second language learners. European Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.47941/ejl.2044

Morgan, D. L., & Hoffman, K. A. (2018). A system for coding the interaction in focus groups and dyadic interviews. The Qualitative Report, 23(3), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2733

Musa, O. R. E., Subaiah, S., & Mohammed, S. B. A. (2022). Investigating the importance of conversational implicature and violation of maxims in daily conversations. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 13(2), 109-122. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.8

Newstron, J. W., & Davis, K. (1993). Organizational behaviour, human behaviour at work. New York: McGraw-Hill.

O'Keeffe, A. & Walsh, S. (2012). Applying corpus linguistics and conversation analysis in the investigation of small group teaching in higher education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0007

Potts, C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press.

Saeed Qadir, M. H. (2022). A pragmatic analysis of the speech act of warning by Kurdish EFL learners in social contexts. Journal of University of Human Development, 8(4), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.21928/juhd.v8n4y2022.pp23-32

Şengül, C. (2018). Customized forms of Kurdishness in Turkey: State rhetoric, locality, and language use. Lexington Books.

Sert, O., & Seedhouse, P. (2011). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Novitas-ROYAL: Research on Youth and Language, 5(1), 1-14.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press.

Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Jawzal, N., & Mohammed , F. (2025). EXPLORING THE FUNCTIONS OF IMPLICATURES IN NORTHERN KURMANJI. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 13(3), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2025.13.3.1559

Issue

Section

Humanities Journal of University of Zakho

Most read articles by the same author(s)