Factors Influencing Performance of Applied Research: Evidence from the Higher Education Institutions in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Authors

  • Shlair M. Mohammed Department of Economic Sciences, College of Administration and Economics, University of Zakho
  • Rezgar M. Mohammed
  • Snobar J. Rasol
  • Edi S Kachal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2022.10.2.795

Keywords:

Experience, Funding, Probit, Research

Abstract

Knowing what influences researchers on conducting applied research in developing countries is of interest to policymakers in higher education institutions. This study utilized a quantitative approach to investigate factors that drive academics in the higher education institutions in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq on conducting applied research. For this purpose, data were collected using a survey from researchers at different universities and fields and then were analyzed using the probit model. Based on the main findings of this study, the probability of conducting applied research increases as the years of experience increase when a researcher has external funding, while the probability decreases as the years of experience increase when a researcher has only the knowledge of applying to external funding without actually having any funding available. This study recommends some actions that help in promoting the research field in the higher education institutions in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.  

Author Biography

Shlair M. Mohammed, Department of Economic Sciences, College of Administration and Economics, University of Zakho

زانستێن ئابوری

References

Acharya, K. P., & Pathak, S. (2019). Applied Research in Low-Income Countries: Why and How? Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 4(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2019.00003
Altbach, P. (2007). The Imperial Tongue: English as the Dominating Academic Language. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(36), 3608-3611. Retrieved April 30, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40276356
Altbach, P. G. (2013). Advancing the National and Global Knowledge Economy: The Role of Research Universities in Developing Countries. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.773222
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., Yudkevich, M., Androushchak, G., & Pacheco, I. F. (2012). Paying the Professoriate: A Global Comparison. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
Buchheit, S., Collins, A. B., & Collins, D. L. (2001). Intra-Institutional Factors that Influence Accounting Research Productivity. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 17(2), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v17i2.2070
Chan, L. & Costa, S. (2005). Participation in the Global Knowledge Commons: Challenges and Opportunities for Research Dissemination in Developing Countries. New Library World, 106(3/4), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800510587354
Chen, Y., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2006). Factors That Motivate Business Faculty to Conduct Research: An Expectancy Theory Analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.4.179-189
Chow, C. W., & Harrison, P. (1998). Factors Contributing to Success in Research and Publications: Insights of Influential Accounting Authors. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(3-4), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(98)00030-X
Jahan F., Siddiqui, M. A., Khabouri, Z. A., Riyami, R. F. M. A., & Ahuja, A. (2018). Factors Influencing Quality of Academic Research: Perception of Faculty Researchers at Oman Medical College. Medical and Clinical Archives, 2(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.15761/MCA.1000127
Greene, W. H. 2008. Econometric Analysis. 6th edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
Cargile, B., & Bublitz, B. (1986). Factors Contributing to Published Research by Accounting Faculties. The Accounting Review, 61(1), 158-178. Retrieved April 30, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/247530
Diamond, A. M. (1986). The Life-Cycle Research Productivity of Mathematicians and Scientists. Journal of Gerontology, 41(4), 520-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/41.4.520
Goodwin, A. H., & Sauer, R. D. (1995). Life Cycle Productivity in Academic Research: Evidence from Cumulative Publication Histories of Academic Economists. Southern Economic Journal, 61(3), 729-743. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060993
Hu, Q., & Gill, T. G. (2000). IS Faculty Research Productivity: Influential Factors and Implications. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2000040102
Levitan, A. S., & Ray, R. (1992). Personal and Institutional Characteristics Affecting Research Productivity of Academic Accountants. Journal of Education for Business, 67, 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1992.10117569
Ma, W., & Wen, J. (2013). The Chinese Academic Profession: New Realities. In The Global Future of Higher Education and the Academic Profession: The BRICs and the United States, ed. Altbach, P. G., Androushchak, G., Kuzminov, Y., Reisberg, L., & Yudkevich, M. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wood, F. (1990). Factors Influencing Research Performance of University Academic Staff. Higher Education, 19, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142025
World Bank. (2021). World Development Indicators. Retrieved February 24, 2021, from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Mohammed, S., Mohammed, R. ., Rasol, S. ., & Kachal, E. . (2022). Factors Influencing Performance of Applied Research: Evidence from the Higher Education Institutions in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 10(2), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2022.10.2.795

Issue

Section

Humanities Journal of University of Zakho