Kurdish EFL Student Teachers’ Perceptions Towards Their School-Based Teaching Practice Course

Authors

  • Zaki H. Mohammad University of Duhok
  • Mohamed B. Al-Azzawi university of Mosul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2024.12.1.1265

Keywords:

EFL, student teachers, perceptions, teaching practice

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Teaching practice holds paramount significance within the domain of teacher education and training, providing student teachers with a tangible opportunity to acquire practical knowledge and firsthand experience in the dynamics of schooling and classroom pedagogy. This study set out to investigate the perceptions of EFL student teachers regarding the school-based teaching practice course in four colleges of education and basic education in Duhok province of the Kurdistan Region-Iraq. A combined qualitative and quantitative methodological approach was used to gather the research data. A paper and online questionnaire provided quantitative data from 132 participants, complemented by conducting semi-structured interviews with 16 student teachers. The results showed that the teaching practice experience was deemed ineffective and inadequate in preparing to become qualified EFL teachers. The results further revealed that the majority of the elements involved in the topic being studied were deemed unsatisfactory and there were multiple areas for improvement in the phenomenon. The implications of these findings extend our understanding of the process and procedures of the teaching practice course in this specific context. The findings presented add to our understanding of the various aspects of the subject. The research has the potential to inform policy decisions and practical interventions, thereby positively influencing the field and leading to tangible improvements. This study holds significant importance as it addresses a critical gap in existing research, shedding light on an area that has thus far been underexplored.  A significant limitation of the current study is its exclusive focus on student teachers as the primary data collection subjects. Therefore, future research should consider investigating the perspectives of other stakeholders involved in the teaching practice, including university supervisors, school principals, representatives of English departments, the course developers, and focal persons.

References

REFERENCES

Abdulrahman, B. S. (2019). Kurdish EFL student teachers’ practicum experience: some basic challenges. Journal of University of Human Development, 5 (2),13-19.

Al-Qasmi, F. Kh. S. (2017). An evaluative study of the school based practicum course in a pre-service English language teacher preparation programme at a college of education, Oman [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Exeter]. http://hdl.handle.net/10871/37384.

Bartholomew, S. S. & Sandholtz, J. H. (2009). Competing views of teaching in a school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25,155-165.

Brime, A. A. & Amin, Zh. H. (2020). The implementation of communicative Language Teaching by Kurdish EFL Student-Teachers at Colleges of Education. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 27(6), 56-41. http://www.jtuh.tu.edu.iq

Clarke, A & Collins, J. (2009). Mentoring profile inventory. http://www.mentoringprofile.com/.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K., (2012). Research methods in education. Routledge, New York.

Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crookes, G. (2003). A practicum in TESOL: professional development through teaching practice. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.

Darden, G., Darden, A., Scott, K., & Westfall, S. (2001). The student-teaching experience. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 72(4), 50-53.

Darling-Hammond, L. & Chung, R. & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: how well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53. 286-302.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). “Here’s the book, go teach the class”. RELC Journal, 39, 226-241.

Grudnoff, L. (2011). Rethinking the practicum: limitations and possibilities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 223-234.

Gürsoy, E. (2013). Improving practicum for a better teacher training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93, 420 – 425. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281303317X

Haji, N. (2019). Perceptions of In-service EFL Teachers about Their Pre-service Practicum Experience in Iraqi-Kurdistan. IJSSES 5(4), 193-208.

Hamasaid, H. H. & Saheb, B. M. (2020). Challenges experienced by Kurdish EFL student-teachers during their teaching practicum. HUJ, 5(4).

Kee, A. N. (2012). Feelings of preparedness among alternatively certified teachers: what is the role of program features? Journal of Teacher Education, 63(1), 23–38.

Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A Set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410 .

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

How to Cite

Mohammad, Z. H., & B. Al-Azzawi, M. (2024). Kurdish EFL Student Teachers’ Perceptions Towards Their School-Based Teaching Practice Course. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 12(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2024.12.1.1265

Issue

Section

Humanities Journal of University of Zakho