Distinguishing the Multifunctional bound Morpheme from the Portmanteau morph in the Kurdish Language

Authors

  • Heval A. Hussein Department of Kurdish Language, Faculty of Humanities, Zakho University, Kurdistan Region-Iraq.
  • Dilbrin A. Ali Department of Kurdish Language, College of Construction Education, University of Zakho, Kurdistan Region-Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2022.10.3.938

Keywords:

Multifunctional bound Morpheme, Portmanteau Morph, Linguistic Environment, Derivational Function and Inflectional Function

Abstract

The research is tackled entitled “Distinguishing the Multifunctional bound Morpheme from the Portmanteau-morph in the Kurdish language”, since a hypothesis was made between them in the Kurdish language, and this study is dedicated to it. This term was mixed and used or interpreted below one phenomenon by Kurdish researchers and linguists. To know it, how to distinguish between these two terms and what is the reason that they were mixed by linguists. In order to get to know it more, to write about this title and apply the descriptive approach in it, searching to be done from the introduction and conclusion. The study is divided into four sections. In The first section, it deals with evaluating the previous researches on these two the two terms. The second section, the Multifunctional bound morpheme and its properties with the types of multifunctional at the level of bound morphemes that the restriction has been determined. The third section talks about the morph of the Portmanteau and its specificity. The fourth section distinguishes between a Multifunctional bond morpheme Pluralism and the Portmanteau morph. In the end, the study concluded that these two terms are completely different, and the main reason Its difference is due to the linguistic environment, because the Multifunctional bound morpheme can express many functions, including Inflectional and derivational in different environments. But the Portmanteau morph represents in one environment many Inflectional functions (morphemes).

 

 

References

-حاتم وليل محمد (2019). مؤرفؤلؤجيى. ب.ج: ب.د.
-حةيدةر حاجى خدر (2010). تايبةتمةنديية مؤرِفؤلؤذييةكانى زمانى كوردى لة رِوانطةى ثؤلينى مؤرِفؤلؤذيانةى زمانةكانةوة. نامةيا ماستةرىَ (نةبةلاظكرى)، زانكؤيا سةلَاحةدين: كؤليذا زمان.
-سةعيد كةرةمى (1396). وشةناسيى زمانى كوردى. سنندج: ثةخشانطاى زانستطاى كوردستان.
-سةلام ناوخؤش (2018). لةبارةى مؤرفؤلؤجى و سينتاكس و مؤرفؤسينتاكس. هةوليَر: لة بلَاوكراوةكانى كتيَبخانةى ديدار.
-شنؤ عةولَا حةمةدئةمين (2014). فرةئةركى لة زمانى كورديدا. نامةيا ماستةرىَ (نةبةلاظكرى)، زانكؤيا كؤية: فةكؤلتييا ثةروةردة.
-شهاب شيخ طيب و فةيسةلَ غازى محةمةد (2022). فرةئةركى مؤرفيمةكان لة زمانى كورديدا، مؤرفيمى (لة) بة نموونة. Journal of the College of Languages, No (46), Pg 338-367.
-شيَرزاد سةبرى عةلى و ئاراز مونيب (2016). وشةسازى. دهؤك: دةزطةهىَ نالبةند يىَ ضاث و وةشانىَ.
-طارق صالح محمود (2014). بنةما طشتى و تايبةتييةكانى رِيَزمانى كوردى لةبةر رِؤشنايى تيؤرةكةى ضومسكيدا. نامةيا ماستةرىَ (نةبةلاظكرى)، زانكؤيا سةلاحةدين: كؤليذى ثةروةردة.
-محةمةدى مةحويى (2010). مؤرفؤلؤذيى و بةيةكداضوونى ثيَكهاتةكان. بةرطى يةكةم، سليَمانى: زانكؤى سليَمانى.
-نازنين جلال احمد (2015). فرةئةركى مؤرفيمة بةندة رِيَزمانييةكان لة زمانى كورديدا (كرمانجى سةروو)دا. مجلة الاستاذ. ذمارة (84)، ل649-668.
-يارا قادر حةمةد مةلا زادةيى (2013). مؤرفؤسينتاكس لة شيَوةزارى كؤيةدا. سليَمانى: بةرِيَوةبةرايةتى ضاث و بلَاوكردنةوةى سليَمانى.
-فوزى حسن الشايب (1999). محاظرات فى اللسانيات. عمان، الاردن: منشورات وزارة الثقافة.
-Benjamin Bruening (2017). Consolidated Morphology, A Non-Distributed, Purely Syntavtic Theory of Morphology. University of Delaware.
-FRANCIS KATAMBA (1993). MORPHOLOGY. America: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data.
-GEOEGE YOLE (2017). THE SDUDY OF LANGUAGE. Sixth edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
-Marko Simonovic and Boban Arsenijevic (2020). Syntax predicts prosody: Multi-purpose moephemes in Serbo-Croatian. Berlin: Language Science Press.
-Norman C. Stageberg (1981). An Introducttory English Gramar. America: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data.
-Ongayo Francis Onyango (2016). An Analysis of Dholuo Portmanteau Morph: Redefining the Portmanteau Morph. International Journal of Academic Education and Development, 5(1), p15-20.
-VIVIAN COOK (1993). LINGUISTICS AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. St. Martin,s Press.
-Hein Van Der voort (2011). Reduplication of person markers in kwaza. Acta lingustica Hafniansia, published online: 24 now 2011. Pages (65-94). Opened in: 30/6/2022.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03740463.2003.10416074>>
-MORPH, ALLOMORPH AND MORPHEME. Opened in: 22/6/2022.
<https://old.amu.ac.in/emp/stuc>

Published

2022-09-24

How to Cite

Hussein, haval, & Ali, D. . (2022). Distinguishing the Multifunctional bound Morpheme from the Portmanteau morph in the Kurdish Language. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 10(3), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2022.10.3.938

Issue

Section

Humanities Journal of University of Zakho