EROS VERSUS THANATOS IN MILAN KUNDERA’S NOVEL IMMORTALITY (1991)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2026.14.4.1784Keywords:
Eros, Thanatos, Kundera, Freud, Marcuse, Agnes, Laura, ImmortalityAbstract
The article examines the dual and nondual interrelation of Eros and Thanatos, as respectively described by Sigmund Freud and Herbert Marcuse, and as subsequently and involuntarily embodied in Milan Kundera’s novel Immortality (1991). In the course of the interdisciplinary research, which is based on the literary text analysis from the philosophical and psychoanalytic perspectives, the author of the article argues that the characters in the novel are shaped by Sigmund Freud’s and Herbert Marcuse’s views on Eros and Thanatos. Eros, the living force, and Thanatos, the death instinct, are presented in a dual interrelation through the character of Agnes, the protagonist in Milan Kundera’s novel. This artistic representation of Eros and Thanatos, in which the drives constantly confront each other and determine human behavior, follows Freud’s views as reflected in his essay “Beyond the Pleasure Principle” (1920) and his later works. Nondual interrelation of Eros and Thanatos is embodied in the character of Agnes’ younger sister, Laura, who is juxtaposed with the protagonist. Laura’s behavioral pattern is grounded in Marcuse’s theory of nondual instincts, as described in his work “Eros and Thanatos” (1955). If unrepressed, according to Marcuse, Eros transforms the destructive powers of Thanatos into creative energy. This kind of transformation is illustrated in Kundera’s characters of Laura and the episodic artist Rubens, who has received his nickname after a famous 17th-century Flemish painter. The novel finds its artistic closure in the celebration of the unrepressed Eros - through the characters of Laura and Rubens. The research findings contribute to the expansion of Kunderian studies and to the analysis of the foundational novel by Milan Kundera (1929-2023), who is considered the prominent European writer of the 20th-century. Moreover, the study of Kundera’s work from the philosophical and psychological perspectives reveals the novel’s relation to the theories of two great thinkers – Sigmund Freud and Herbert Marcuse.
Downloads
References
Babenko, O. A. (2023). Immortality as a Sociocultural Contribution: Milan Kundera’s Novel and Russian Philosophical Thought. Journal of Duhok University, 26(1), 534-548.
Che, L. (2011). Between Dream and Reality: Dream-Narrative in Milan Kundera’s Fiction. Philosophy and Culture, 38(9): 67–82.
Bloom, H. (Ed.). (2003). Milan Kundera: Bloom’s Modern Critical Views. Chelsea House.
Danyali, A. (2020). The Empire of the Gaze: From Foucauldian dispersed power to Kundera’s kitsch (A Case Study of the Unbearable Lightness of Being). Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 13(29), 217–237.
Freud, S. (1955). Beyond the pleasure principle. In J. Strachey, ed. and trans., The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, in 24 vols. London: The Hogarth Press, 18:3–64. (Original work published 1920).
Janiec-Nyitrai, A., Zelenková, A. (2025). Milan Kundera and his “Central European” path to worldliness. Neohelicon, 52(2), 649–665.
Just, D. (2015). Milan Kundera and the Poetics of Novelistic Truth. Poetics Today (1 September) 36 (3): 175–200.
Kli, M. (2018) Eros and Thanatos: A Nondual Interpretation: The Dynamic of Drives in Personal and Civilizational Development from Freud to Marcuse. Psychoanalytic Review, 105 (1), 67–89.
Kundera, M. (1991). Immortality. Transl. from Czech by P. Kussi. London: Faber and Faber Limited.
Kundera, M. (2005). The Art of the Novel. (L. Asher., Trans.). Faber and Faber. (Original work published 1986).
Kunes, K. von (2019). Milan Kundera’s Fiction: A Critical Approach to Existential Betrayals. Lexington Books.
Lightfoot, D. (1998). Perceiving the Fictional World of Nesmrtelnost Through Kundera’s “I.” Canadian Slavonic Papers / Revue Canadienne Des Slavistes, 40(1/2), 79–90.
MacMilllan, C. (2021). The uncanny and the ‘Great Return’ from exile: Unheimlich (Un)homecomings in Milan Kundera’s Ignorance. Litera, 31(1), 121–136.
Marcuse, H. (1966) Chapter Eleven: Eros and Thanatos. In: Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 222–237. (Original work published 1955).
McAlpin, M. (2005). Goethe’s NumberOne Fan: A NeoFeminist Reading of Bettina Brentano von Arnim. Comparative Literature, 57(4), 294–311.
Novák, R. (2023). Polyphony of form and ideas in the works of Milan Kundera. Journal of European Studies, 53(2), 179–197.
Orság, P. (2026). “Memory of the nation outside the body of the nation”: Identity, memory, media and Czechoslovak exile. Memory, Mind & Media, 5.
Paliy, O. (2020). The narrative structure of the novel by Milan Kundera Immortality. Comparative Studies of Slavic Languages and Literatures. In memory of Academician Leonid Bulakhovsky: 222–238.
Prague exhibition highlights Kundera’s relationship to translations. (2019, October 3). Radio Prague International.
Ricard, F. (2004) Agnès’s final afternoon: An essay on the work of Milan Kundera (A. Asher, Trans.). Perennial. (Original work published 2003).
Rupnik, J. (2024). Milan Kundera's Liberating Exile. Social Research: An International Quarterly 91(2), 491–510.
Ross, S. (2000). The Abdication of Culture: The Ideology of Imagology in Milan Kundera’s “Immortality”. Modern Fiction Studies, 46(2), 331–354.
Sherlaimova, S. A. (2014) Milan Kundera i Ego Romannaia Filosofia [Milan Kundera and His Philosophy of the Novel]. Moscow: Indrik; The Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Sutton, M. (2024). Milan Kundera’s Philosophy of the Novel. Philosophy Now: Philosophy and Literature, 161: 16–19.
Sztorc, J. (2006). Immortality by Milan Kundera – a novel that thinks. Tekstualia, 4(7), 53-66.
Tighe, C. (2014). Kundera’s kidnap revisited. Journal of European Studies, 44(2), 112–133.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Olga Alexandrovna Babenko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online.










